Notice: Undefined index: usr in /homepages/6/d168803796/htdocs/drunkenrantings.com/sys/auth.php on line 258
The Modernisation Of The Conservative Party :: Drunken Rantings
Drunken Rantings   A Big-Mouthed  
Politically-Incorrect Blog  
About the UK...  

...it may be crap, but at least it's genuine crap!  
Home     Your Rants     Your Comments     Your Blogs     Login    Register    
About
Contact
Links
Caveat

 
The DR Manifesto...

Manifesto
I'm not standing for office. I'd be a shite politician, partly because I'm unpleasantly honest and partly because I hate wearing suits... If I wasn't, this is what I'd be campaigning on...
(26 Feb 2007)

 
'Please let my Mother live!'...

Environment
There's only one way to ensure our survival as a species - live sustainably. It's easy!

Nuclear Idiocy
(15 January 2007)

Sustainability
(16 October 2006)

Global Warming
(15 October 2006)

Housing Shortage
(15 October 2006)

Cycle Paths
(11 October 2006)

Tourism
(10 October 2006)

 
Main Topics...

Make Drugs Legal
Prohibition doesn't work, duh! It gives too much money to organised crime... Updated: Letter to the Telegraph 'Alcohol and Tobacco are the gateway drugs - if there is such a thing...'
(Upd: 11 Mar 2006)

Errant Fathers
How can fathers be expected to 'take responsibility' for their kids when the law always presumes in favour of the mother? I got a reply - and here's my reply to that Welfare and Compensation Culture = No Legal Responsibility
(Upd: 11 Mar 2007)

A New Political System
A solution for: Party Funding, Reform of The House Of Lords, and it incidentally makes the whole voting process far more democratic...
(Upd: 25 Feb 2007)

Principles
My principles of government.
(Upd: 25 Feb 2007)

Road Pricing
Tony Blair and the entire Labour Government are cretins... Road pricing has to be the most hare-brained scheme ever - devised by the evil cretinous muppets from hell - the Politicians...
(19 Feb 2007)

Old People
Old folks have no respect in our culture. That is so wrong!...
(18 Feb 2007)

Poverty
How do we define poverty? How do we reduce it? Well, not taxing the poor would help...
(18 Feb 2007)

Europe
The EU is a criminal organisation intent on conquest...
(Upd: 30 January 2007)

Cash for Honours
Why would anyone give money to a political party?..
(16 January 2006)

Social Security
A fresh approach to the problem of how to provide social security...
(15 January 2006)

David Cameron
David Cameron and the Conservative Party...
(12 December 2006)

Random Rants
Some random musings...
(12 November 2006)

Prisons
If prisoners are 'paying their debt to society' - why is is so damn expensive to keep them?
(21 October 2006)

Tax
Taxes kill businesses and people.
(16 October 2006)

Free Speech
Some peoples brains work overtime trying to figure out how to turn opinions into insults...
(14 October 2006)

Health
Why are tax-payers footing the bill for sex-change operations and IVF?
(13 October 2006)

Law
British law is stupidly complex and inefficient. You'd never design a system like that...
(13 October 2006)

Education
Educators need to aim higher, and politicians need to butt-out.
(12 October 2006)

Security
It was a no-brainer that invading Iraq with Bush would cause more grievances than it solved. When has starting a war ever brought peace?
(8 October 2006)

The Modernisation Of The Conservative Party:
Letter To David Cameron

Dear David,
  I am a 'natural conservative', and I would love to vote for your party in the next general election, but...

(Please Note: I post all correspondance on my blog http://www.drunkenrantings.com)

While I believe your work to modernise the party has, in many cases been a positive thing, the party seems to have lost it's roots and is still lacking the fundamental direction which it ought to have...

The electorate are sick of spin. We want principles. You seem to abandoned the traditional Tory principles, and taken on the Blairite 'principle' of 'say what you need to to get what you want' instead. If this is incorrect then please tell the world - I do read the papers...

The core conservative principles - as I always understood them - were fundamentally anti-statist - as opposed to labour principles which are heavily statist:

  • Low taxes
  • Minimum government, but excellent public services / facilities
  • Personal freedom, and more choice
  • Opportunity for all

The things that have failed the Tories in the past, have never been these core principles. On the contrary, most failures have been caused by not sticking to these simple and evidently honourable principles...

The UK does not need or want more 'social engineering'. What it needs is better facilities, less regulation, less taxation, and less government interference.

The Tories biggest recent failure has been the surrendering of our sovreignty to the EU and the constant lies (sorry, no other word for it) that have been fed to the electorate about it's aims. The EU's clearly stated aims are, and always have been, political integration. Nothing less.

The way the Thatcher government, and subsequently, the Blair government have failed to be honest with those they should represent has been a major part of the breakdown in trust in British politics. To regain the trust of the electorate - a dose of honesty about the EU would go a long way...

If you could tell us exactly how we can legally and diplomatically stay within the EU while retaining business, and the remaining shreds of our sovreignty (and ideally regaining the rest) then I would join the Conservatives tomorrow. What the electorate want is properly thought through, workable solutions, and any party with the intelligence and guts to propose some would certainly stand out from the crowd.

The UK only prospers when it's citizens are well trained, and free to live their own way.

The UK desperately needs a better education system, but that will not be achieved by bureaucrats. Traditional Tory principles would suggest the sector is deregulated, and that an 'education credits' scheme is set up...

Parents should be able to choose from a diverse range of education for their children, and should not be forced into sending their children to a 'one-size-fits-all' comprehensive (or 'city academy' which is simply a comprehensive by another name). Deregulation, and selection by any criteria, by both parents and school, would improve the system faster than any government schemes ever will.

I went to an appalling comprehensive for 2 years, but was 'saved' by 3 years at private school prior to my 'O' levels, but I fear I will not be able to afford that for my son, even though it seems it will be all the more necessary due to the chronic fall in standards. All the things that matter have become far more expensive over the last 20 years, (i.e. private education) and the local comprehensives are absolutely not good enough! Conservative principles dictate that you should be promoting choice, and free enterprise - in the education sector as well as in business, not denying choice... This approach would probably work for the NHS too...

Please - we do not need an 'Heir to Blair' - what we need is a complete break from 'Marketing Politics', and a return to real Principles-based politics...

I'm afraid the current focus on 'social conscience' is utterly disingenuous. It is simply more marketing spiel which attempts to make the government seem powerful and useful...


Policies which would genuinely help people, the environment, and be popular:

1) TAX & REGULATION:

  • If you really want to help poor people, take them right out of the tax system by instituting a flat-rate income tax system (similar to that in many eastern european nations) which only starts at £20k. You could then abolish the ludicrous 'tax-credits' system.
  • You should also propose to de-regulate and de-tax the small business sector. (Lower business rates, less employment tax, less regulation...) - It is incredibly difficult for small businesses to make any money these days - and they are competing with multinationals with the advantage of economy of scale. This advantage is hugely increased by the burden of red-tape on small businesses.
  • Low taxes stimulate the economy. Gordon Brown's entire policy is based on the erroneous assumption that tax 'costs the economy nothing' - whereas even I have seen the death of entire sectors of business due to taxes rendering them unprofitable. If you reduce taxes - you often end up taking more revenue. This should be a central principle for the Conservatives. If you appear to be converting to a tax and spend party, then you will probably lose the next election.

1a) TAX... & GLOBAL WARMING

If CO2 emissions really are a problem, then why on earth are renewable technologies subject to any taxes at all? If all taxes and most regulations were removed from the renewable energy sector - how long do you think we'd still be using fossil fuels for?

If global warming is so important to combat - then de-tax and de-regulate the renewable energy sector.


2) SCHOOLS & HEALTH:

Insist that every school has a playing field, and a swimming pool which is open to the public during the holidays (where space allows, else try to buy a site as near as possible - i.e. buy back the playing fields).

Alter the school day so there is an hour and a half of PE every day - at both primary and seconday schools.

Add an hour and a half of 'homework time' at the end of the secondary school day - and keep these older kids at school until 6pm.

Bullying: Remove all ambiguity! Institute a country-wide procedure for all schools - '3 strikes and you're out' corroborated by more than 1 teacher. Require schools to suspend / expel children if the rules are broken. Provide dedicated schools for excluded children. Provide a mechanism for them to return to mainstream schooling once trained in basic manners & non-violence...


3) HEALTH & EXERCISE FACILITIES:

This country has a dire shortage of decent exercise facilities - and an increasingly obese, unhappy and under-exercised population - a coincidence you think? Exercise is vital for mental as well as physical health, and access to these facilities (which we currently do not have locally) would make a huge difference to the wellbeing of the country.

£10Bn spent on the olympics will not be 'good for the nations heath'. You should be contrasting the money spent there with investment in sports facilities in the country as a whole... If that money were spent on proper facilities across the country - it would genuinely benefit everyone - not just Londoners... How many top-quality sports centers could we build for that £10Bn?

I'm not suggesting we should dump the olympics - on the contrary what I'm suggesting is we find another £10Bn to spend on proper, free, excellent facilities for everyone in the country. Perhaps we could pay for it by scrapping a thousand or so quangos, or even better - the regional assemblies... In fact, one could easily argue that the money would be quickly saved in the NHS due to the population being healthier - a genuine investment in the future...

The facilities I envisage are zero-emmission, minimalist, low-cost, and beautiful. Containing:

  • Heated, indoor (connecting to a separate) outdoor swimming pool
  • Fully kitted gym.
  • Climbing wall
  • Wall for ball games
  • Skating area
  • Barbecue / seating - ... Other facilities we could invest in where appropriate:
  • Dry ski-slopes
  • Canoeing / Boating
  • Cycle / Foot paths - Please see below: - ...

    ...and they should be given to the local council to run, with a decent maintenance budget.


    4) CYCLE & FOOT PATHS = WILDLIFE REGENERATION + HEALTHIER PEOPLE

    As a cyclist, you are probably aware how cycling on roads with cars and lorries is unpleasant at best, and downright suicidal at times... Have you ever been to Holland and seen their cycle tracks?

    You are probably also aware of the dramatic reduction in wildlife in the UK - due to loss of habitat (i.e. hedges & wild areas) - due to agricultural policy. This horrifies us good country folk who love our home...

    We should provide cycle / foot paths wherever it is physically possible, alongside roads. They should follow a specific layout (please see this page: http://www.drunkenrantings.com/cycle-paths.php) so they fulfill a number of different aims: With proper cycle paths people would be able to bike or walk around the country again - in the safety of dedicated, tree-lined corridors. Wildlife would return because the hedges would be back, and we could even harvest wood from the trees to sequester CO2 (or provide energy)...

    Where the land is common, the council should build them, where the land is agricultural - a subsidy should be provided.

    Again, we can argue that this would save as much money as it costs in the NHS. It would help us reduce traffic and to meet our CO2 emissions targets too.

    Also, having all these great facilities (sports centers, cycle paths etc...) will boost our tourism industry considerably...

    Compulsory purchase infringes peoples basic property rights and should not be used (and indeed compulsory orders to provide the proposed coastal path should be vigorously opposed by the Conservatives on the principle that it impinges on individual sovreignty for no good reason at all!).


    In Summary

    Government's competence lies in providing the environment in which appropriate activities flourish - i.e. by manipulating taxes to discourage the use of 4x4s, or by planning & funding the building of facilities so people can exercise.

    When government fails at it's core competencies - for example by giving away our sovreignty to the EU, destroying our pensions, or taxing renewables out of the market (used chip fat...), how then can it expect to achieve success at the things it's traditionally bad at - like managing large organisations or projects? Furthermore, how can it expect to be valued by it's electorate?

    You will win the next election easily - if you can just remember what the Conservative Party stands for:

    Better Facilities. Less regulation. Less taxes. Paid for by Smaller, More Efficient Government.

     

    Reply NOT From David Cameron...

    Thank you for your e-mail.

    David Cameron has recently written two articles - one for the Daily Telegraph and one for The Sunday Times - in which he addresses many of the concerns you raise. I do hope that by reading these articles, which I have attached for your interest, you will feel reassured about the direction we are taking.

    Yours sincerely,

    Alice Sheffield

    Office of David Cameron MP
    House of Commons
    London SW1A 0AA

     

    So I Replied - FFS!

    Hi Alice,
      I'm afraid these articles do not reassure me at all - on the contrary I find this response little short of insulting - as you clearly have not taken much time to read and consider the letter which I spent several hours writing.

    Furthermore - the letter was not addressed to you, with respect, it was addressed to David Cameron... I fear that this letter, along with all the others I have sent over the previous months will not now make it into Mr Cameron's inbox because you have 'dealt' with it... If you are filtering all Mr Cameron's correspondance, then exactly which criteria do you use to determine what's 'important' and what's 'not important'? Are you sure you're getting it right - because from my perspective it looks as if Mr Cameron is in dire need of some good advice...

    So where is this so called 'People Power'??? I seem to be unable to even get an email to Mr Cameron... I have spent considerable time writing to Mr Cameron - many hours! - but I have the feeling he has never read any of my letters - not one - the only conclusion I can draw from this is that the Tories are utterly insincere in this campaign for 'People Power'.

    If the Conservative party *really* believes in people power - then that means listening to *individual* people - like me. So please prove to me that it's not just all hot air - and give my letter to Mr Cameron!

    I would expect a thoughtful and considered reply from Mr Cameron himself. It wouldn't do him any harm to spend an hour or so considering the points I have raised, it may even give him a fresh perspective.



     

    Comments

    This is a sporadically moderated blog. I am not responsible for anything below!

    There are no comments for this page.

    To add your own comments, click here to login or register

  •  
    The Internet Content Ratings Association says Drunken Rantings is the work of Lucifer.

    © DrunkenRantings.com 2005-2007